
This is my second R-09 class recorder. The prior unit, a R-09, has a similar case, but the tripod is much more durable than this unit. It has served us well for over a year in regular use.
The current unit arrived broken. The connection between the legs and the body of the tripod are MUCH flimsier than the prior model. However, there is no method to connect a better tripod to the R-09HR without the case. As the two are packaged as a unit, one must purchase the useless tripod with the very useful case.
I cannot recommend the purchase of the tripod. Buy it for the case knowing that you will need a different tripod. The Ultrapod is a good choice and can support a small camera.
Net Rating for the package:
Case – 5
Tripod – 0
I have a Roland Recorders Roland CDX-1 but the CD-RW died about 2 years after i bought it. Roland wanted $600 to install a new one so I’m buying a new DAW instead. What are some reliable picks?
Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Tags: Babs, Current Unit, Keyword, Legs, Product Reviews, Roland, Tripod, Ultrapod

























August 21st, 2010 at 7:08 am
I’ve used the the original R-09 for over 3 1/2 years, and been in love with it from the day I bought it. I use it to record church services and make CD’s from the recordings, to record meetings instead of taking notes, to record doctor visits, or to just record improvisations on the keyboard. The sound quality is excellent, whether recording as .WAV or .MP3, and the pickup sensitivity is amazing. It is still going strong, but when I decided to get a second one and leave the first at church, I went for the newer R-09HR.
The R-09HR improves on the R-09 in many respects, most notably from my experience:
+ The slippery hard plastic case of the R-09 has been replaced with a non-skid solid rubbery case – no more worrying about it sliding off a music stand.
+ The rubber inserts that surrounded the side controls on the R-09, and were stretching and falling out, have been eliminated.
+ There is now a separate ‘Menu’ button, so the ‘Finder’ doesn’t have to do double-duty.
+ The sound quality seems even better than the R-09.
+ The R-09HR comes with a remote control. I have yet to try it, but I can see it could be useful.
Some other notable differences:
+ It is slightly bigger than the R-09. I liked the more compact size of the R-09, but am willing to trade it for the better case of the R-09HR. The R-09HR still fits (a little more snugly) in the leather Targus camera case that I use as a carrying case.
+ The power button and the back sliders have moved position (no problem unless you are used to them elsewhere!).
+ The batteries now go in a separate compartment, rather than sharing with the SD/USB compartment door. Call me weird, but I don’t share the opinions of others who disliked the R-09 battery door. It may have felt flimsy, but I had no problems in 3 1/2 years, and the disadvantage of the new R-09HR arrangment is that the battery door comes off completely, so it can get separated. I think this may also be part of the reason the R-09HR is slightly bulkier.
On the slight downside:
+ The addition of a small speaker doesn’t seem worth the added real estate. The output volume is low and the playback quality is, well, pathetic. Maybe some will find it useful just for checking recording pickup, but I’d have been happy without it (especially if the case size could have been reduced).
+ I don’t feel like the battery meter is as accurate as on the R-09, nor am I certain if the battery life is as good as on the R-09. I had one case where I was using the R-09HR and it showed just 1 battery step down from full (and yes, I had the battery type correct), and it died within 1/2 hour. I’m now careful to make sure I put fresh batteries in if I have any doubt. This is not an objective measure, as I haven’t actually compared the R-09 and R-09HR under the exact same conditions, but I definitely do not trust the battery life indicator on the R-09HR the way I did on the R-09. On the flip side, I listened to playback on a set of batteries for over 4 hours, so it may be either the recording side is more power-consumptive, or truly is just the battery life indicator.
+ The R-09HR overall looks/feels a little more utilitarian than the R-09, which had a nicer esthetic look/feel (but at the same time this contributed to it being more slippery).
+ I wish both the R-09 and R-09HR came with an option to make the Record a one-touch function. I’m always morbidly afraid of not getting an important recording because I’ve failed to push the Record twice (this happened to me a couple times when I first got the R-09).
To sum up, though, the R-09HR is a fantastic recorder with excellent sound quality and pickup. You can take the recordings directly into editing software and with a little volume adjustment burn perfectly usable CD’s that are just like you were there when the recording was made.
August 21st, 2010 at 6:46 pm
Fast service, excellent product and user friendly. Very happy with quality of recordings for music rehearsals. Needs a built in tripod mount as opposed to having to purchase the $40.00 leather case.
August 22nd, 2010 at 7:09 am
This amazing compact recording device is easy to operate and produces wonderful recordings. The only criticism I would make concerns the remote control function. In a live performance situation the person operating the recorder will find it awkward to successfully use the remote. Apart from this, I’m very happy with my purchase.
August 22nd, 2010 at 6:46 pm
This is probably one of the best, and easiest to use mp3/wav recorders available. I owned the earlier R-09 version which I had bought for $350 4 years ago. That was absolutely the best price I could find while almost every other online vendor was selling it for no less than $400. Unfortunately if you want to upgrade from the older R-09 to the new R-09HR and try to resell your older model like I did you will be lucky if you get half of your original investment back. The new version has dropped nearly $100 in price to the original price of the old model. Though both versions are basically made of all plastic casing the newer version seems to be made of a little more durable material. My only question to the manufactures (Roland) is why can’t they make it in a steel casing like many digital cameras for the same cost. The only drawback of the new version is it is a little longer and thinner so it needs to be leaned up against something when recording. The older model stood up on its own though a little precariously. The new version records slightly more sensitively from further away. It has a built-in speaker for playback but it is barely audible. And another new feature is a minor editing option of splitting one track into two. If you forgot to turn off the recorder between songs you can now split the track anywhere you’d like even before you throw it on to your computer into an editing program and/or dragging your unedited recordings into your iTunes (or whatever you use). Its a nice little feature. If you have never owned the older version this is a great little recorder- very intuitive- providing some of the best recording quality you will find for this type of hand held unit.
August 23rd, 2010 at 7:10 am
The Edirol R-09 is nothing short of amazing. If you need to record live music, this is the answer.
Using it’s built-in mics, the R-09 does an excellent job of capturing sound with excellent fidelity. To best them, you’ll have to purchase a mic valued at $200 or more.
The controls are simple, obvious, and straightforward. If you spend a few minutes acquainting yourself with them before recording, you shouldn’t run into any problems even the first time you use the device.
I find that I get the best results with near-field recording. When recording piano, for example, I place the R-09 over the keyboard, either suspended by a tripod or lying on a felt cloth. When recording voice, I get fantastic results with the R-09 placed 2-3 feet from the vocalist. And if recording a band, placing the R-09 on a tripod at ear level in the center of the group or in the front row center provides excellent results.
While only a 2GB SD card is the specified maximum capacity, I have found standard – not SDHD – 4 GB SD cards can sometimes work. Good luck, though. I’ve found the 4 GB cards to be slower in writing, making recording more of a hit and miss proposition.
Highly recommended for musicians and music lovers.
August 23rd, 2010 at 6:33 pm
This is an unbelievably simple and efficient way to record MP3 or WAV. You don’t need a card reader because you can plug it straight into the computer to get the files. I use it to record speeches off a sound system by plugging the “line out” from the sound board to the “line in” jack on the recorder. Incredibly easy to use, and easy to switch between sound systems. Highly recommend for ordinary recording purposes!
August 24th, 2010 at 7:11 am
Mixed feelings about the R-09 four months after buying from Amazon. First, it came with dated software. I suppose this is the way things go with modern electronic devices. But you may have update your r-09 via your home PC. It was not that easy: I managed to get the 1.31 software downloaded with help from a friend who has an R-09. My unit shipped in 6/08; 1.31 was released by Roland in 9/07. Without the update, my unit wouldn’t accept a 4 gig card. Haven’t tried an 8 gig. I use the r-09 to record live music. You may want to set the r-09 to record in mp-3 format, as wave takes alot of memory. A four gig card will only last a few hours. The r-09 generally works well. I’ve been careful with the back hinge after reading all the reviews. Currently my r-09 isn’t recording — something’s wrong with it. Still haven’t figured out a good audio program to edit r-09 recordings on the PC. Had used goldwave previously.
August 24th, 2010 at 6:52 pm
I don’t own the Edirol R-09 Recorder but I just did a job where one was provided for me to use and these are my brief impressions.
I am a sound recordist/mixer for the film and television industries. That means I work on camera crews that film or tape TV shows and movies. One of the many kinds of shoots we do is what we call sit down interviews. You watch them everyday. People, sitting in a room, talking about something. Not the most exciting gig but it’s work.
About two weeks ago, I did a sit down interview and the producer provided the Edirol R-09 Digital Recorder for me to use to record the audio I was providing to the cameras onto, so that transcribers could quickly transfer to paper or computer document what had been said in the interview. We used to use small tape recorders to do this and within a year’s time, it’s all gone digital.
I personally own a Zoom H4 Zoom H4 Handy Recorder made by Samson and will be writing a review on that soon. So I had no experience with the R-09 when it was handed to me. I didn’t need any.
The recorder is nice and small, about 30% smaller than the Zoom. Turning it over in your hands, you see that all inputs and outputs are located and labeled well. The control panel on front is also logically set out and labeled well and the function buttons are very intuitive, something that is not true on the Zoom H4.
So I basically just plugged a cable from the proper port of my mixing bag directly into the line in of the R-09, turned on my tone generator, pushed the record button once to see the VU meters, made easy adjustments for volume, and then when the cameras were rolling, pushed the record button again and the R-09 started recording.
Another thing I liked about the R-09 was it’s display. Sure, it’s small because the recorder is small. But it’s perfectly laid out, with everything on it clear and exactly what you need to see to monitor your recording.
I’ve not used the R-09 for live recording through it’s built-in mics, or for recording music. But when played back, the voice recording I did for this television interview was as crystal clear as the master sound I sent to the large broadcast cameras.
That’s enough to impress me and I plan on picking up one of the new updated models of this recorder, the Edirol R-09HR High Resolution Recorder Edirol R-09HR High-Resolution WAVE/MP3 Recorder right away.
August 25th, 2010 at 7:15 am
Definitely buy these accessories for your Edirol 9-09hr. Excellent products that are protective and useful.
August 25th, 2010 at 6:32 pm
Great little leather case for the Edirol R-09HR, however the tabletop tripod is plastic and easily destructible. I doubt it cost more than fourteen cents to manufacture.
The leather case fits perfectly, and does not obstruct access to any of the buttons or screens. The snaps close securely. A fine piece of design that only highlights the crappiness of the tripod.
August 26th, 2010 at 7:10 am
The Edirol Leather Case with Stand works with the 2008 model. The case is a bit snug, not weather safe, but works very well, and is molded with cutouts for the latest model. The included stand is sturdy, and good for general recording.
This is a great buy, offering not only the stand, but outer protection for the unit.
August 26th, 2010 at 6:31 pm
The case is very nice to have, especially because it allows you to attach the recorder to a mic stand or other device. The stand worked great for a while, but nearly the entire unit is plastic. I twisted a leg the wrong way one day and the plastic broke, and is irreparable. I was dissapointed to have spent $50 for a unit that was plastic and broke with such little use. I purchased the stand so that I could record on in various places, but it just is not durable enough.
August 27th, 2010 at 6:43 am
Features: 5
This thing is packed with everything you need to put together music by yourself. I am a musician that usually works by himself, and I could assemble a four piece band by myself on this. You can assemble lengthy drum tracks with a drum pattern editing tool and can select from several drum kits. There are built in stereo condenser microphones for vocals or acoustic guitar that rivaled my mxl 990 in clarity and sound. There are also ports in the back where you can use external stereo mics if you wish. There is also a 1/4 inch cable input that you can use to record guitar and bass with. Not only that, but the amount of built in effects is awesome. There are marshall stack emulators, tube emulators, …all kinds of stuff you can use. Tons of amp, effects, and simulators are included…basically everything you are going to need if you want to do some basic recordings.
For multitracking, you have almost an infinite number of tracks you can use because you can bounce tracks back and forth between each other, combine tracks, and even store virtual tracks elsewhere on the machine when they aren’t in use.
I have used computer setups before and honestly, I get the job done faster and better with this.
Ease of Use: 3
It’s a little complicated sometimes and I had a little trouble figuring out some things even with the use of the manual. I watched tutorials on youtube of how to do certain things on the boss br-600 and it cleared up a lot of questions i had. Be prepared to put some time into figuring this thing out before you get it. After a while, though, you will get the hang of it and be able to work magic with this thing.
Price: 4
I find the average price of $250 to be a little high for this recorder. I found one of these on eBay for $150 and to me, that was well worth it. Don’t get me wrong, this piece of equipment packs a great punch, but the price you see here is set a little high so I’ve given it a 4.
Durability: 5
Everything about this machine feels high quality. When I first got it, I was stunned at how sleek it looked…and mine was used! This feels like it will last a long time and the screen display is great. You can change the brightness if you need to.
Overall: 4.25
This is a great machine and I would recommend it to anyone. It will always have a place in my equipment collection. Later on, I will actually build a nice home studio, but for now, this thing is the ultimate recording studio…and it’s so portable… It even has a battery slot in the back where it can run off AAs if you don’t have a place to plug it in. It is so small and can be taken anywhere with ease. I can even take it traveling with me if I wanted. I take this, my guitar, and a cable to my friends house and we mess around and record all kinds of random stuff. He programs drum beats on his computer and runs them into the machine via a stereo in on the boss so we can record pretty sweet drum beats. Then we record guitar and bass. To me, it’s so easy to use because I have spent time using it and figuring it out.
I don’t think you would regret buying one of these, especially if you get a good deal on one like I did. It’s a great home recording studio all in one box.
August 27th, 2010 at 6:58 pm
I’ve had the BR-600 now for three months and have created several songs that I am overjoyed with. The box is fairly small and turns out some really nice sounding production–professional quality to my admittedly hobbiest ears. The upside is that the system is fairly easy to use–it gets easier with practice–and there are no recording artifacts like white noise, tape noise, etc. Onboard effects for guitar and bass guitar are great. There are a few downsides, however. The biggest is that this is a complex system that takes a lot of time to master. You can do simple songs within a couple of hours of opening the box, but there are so many features that the average Joe will never learn them all. I don’t think I’ve used more than 10% of the system’s capability yet. The other downside are the drum tracks. While there are many of them, and there is a cool way to layout drum arrangements for songs, none of the tracks really seem to suit my needs (basic rock and roll and basic jam band styles). In theory you can create your own drum patterns with the touch-sensitive buttons, but I haven’t yet figured out how to do this well. Seems like you need two VERY talented and agile fingers to make a useful pattern. But all of these are fairly minor gripes if you aren’t looking to be a Grammy winning ar-teest quite yet. Overall the system does all that I need it to do–record four to eight track songs, add effects, mix, and then transfer to my computer. I transfer the songs in .aiff format to I-Tunes and then either play them through my I-Pod on my home stereo system, burn them to CD, or convert them to MP3 to share with friends. All of my friends think the recordings were done professionally!
August 28th, 2010 at 6:36 am
Pros:
- Excellent sound quality.
- Built-in, high-quality stereo condenser mics.
- Tons of features in a very small package.
- Battery or AC power.
- Balanced mic inputs. They are not XLR connectors but they are balanced, so as long as you use a balanced XLR to 1/4″ adapter, you get fully balanced quality inputs from your XLR mic inputs. One balanced adapter is included.
- 64 virtual tracks allow you to record 8 tracks then bounce a mix onto two virtual tracks and then record even more tracks while listening to the mix you’ve already recorded. You can continue to add tracks this way until all 64 virtual tracks are full. The great thing is that, as long as you don’t record over your original recordings then you can still remix everything either in the machine or by dumping all of the tracks to your computer and mixing it there.
- You can record your tracks dry (no effects) but still hear the effects while you record. This allows you to edit or change the effects during the final mix rather than being stuck with the effects that were recorded with the track.
- Ability to dump all of your data to computer for backup.
- Ability to dump all of the tracks from your recording onto a computer where you can edit them with your audio editing application of choice. You can download the software to do this free from Boss’s website.
- Built in drum machine. It sounds pretty good and is fully programmable. Plus, it has its own dedicated stereo track so it does not take up any of the 8 recording tracks. You can even load in tones from CD, computer or another drum machine or sound module.
- Built-in effects that sound pretty good, are customizable, and allow you to add stereo loop effects to individual mono tracks for your final mix and really add some thickness and stereo richness to your mix.
- Very well though out design and fairly easy to use – once you get the basics down.
- Excellent manual! I’ve heard a lot of people bashing the manual but I think it’s great. Very well thought out and easy to use. Yes, it’s thick and full of information and words and stuff. But this machine is packed full of features so it required more than a pamphlet to explain it all. And they do a great job of presenting the information in a tutorial format as well as in an easily accessible reference format so you can either look up something quickly or spend some time reading and learning in depth.
Cons:
- No phantom power for microphones. You have to use an external mic preamp or phantom power adapter.
- A/C adapter not included.
- Should come with a larger memory card. The included card is virtually useless. Buy a 1GB card that has been tested (see the chart on Boss’s website). Anything larger than 1 GB is not supported and some brands and formats will not work.
- Tracks 5/6 and 7/8 are locked as stereo pairs. This means that you cannot record two separate instruments onto these two tracks and have individual control. I don’t know why they made half of the tracks on the machine locked like this but it’s not that big of a deal because you can work around it by bouncing tracks. Basically, you can record either stereo instruments like keyboards, etc. onto these tracks or you can use them to bounce portions of your song onto and then continue recording more tracks.
- The learning curve is not terribly steep but you will have to spend some time learning the system to get the most out of it. If you have a basic understanding of recording, effects, drum machine programming then you will catch on pretty quick.
- Because of the small size of the machine, plus the fact that it has a full set of drum pads, there isn’t much room for a lot of buttons so you do have to dig around in the menus a lot to edit tracks or program the drums, etc., which can slow things down. But once you learn where thing are and how they work you can navigate through the menus pretty quickly.
Conclusion:
A fantastic, portable machine with tons of features and excellent sound that will fulfill almost any need from recording quick ideas or live performances to recording your own album. BUY IT NOW!!!
August 28th, 2010 at 6:37 pm
As some other reviewers said this device is not intended for professional studios….. That being said, it is pretty amazing compared to analog 4 tracks of just a few years ago. The effects it comes with are pretty good, as good as the boss or digitech multi-effect guitar boxes. It has a lot of cool practice features as well, (metronome, phrase trainer etc)I am having a lot of fun with it. It even has a vocal pitch corrector for those of us who are less than stellar singers.
The mic preamp section is kind of noisy, but not too bad. also it does not provide phantom power for condenser mics
It will not work with just any CF card, only older single speed up to 1 GB
This card will work:SanDisk-SDCFB-1024-A10
I would recommend this to anyone looking for a practice tool or a sort of musical sketch pad. It is easily worth the money and then some.
UPDATE: There is a bios upgrade that improves the CF card compatibility. The transcend card I originally purchased now works.