I hope these listings will be very helpful to you. If you are like me, you need a bit more of information before making your decision. Here is a description of Professional Mixing Consoles for you.
Can Sony Fans please try to prove me wrong?
Okay, you probably read some answers from me, where heated discussions broke loose because I recommended the Xbox 360 to an asker. Don’t get me wrong! This is not a trolling attempt or an incentive to break out a flame war. I want factual reasons. Provide links and evidence to your answers!I say: My Xbox 360 can do everything my PS3 does. Only better and cheaper. What I can do on the Xbox 360 that the PS3 can’t:I can *talk* to up to 7 additional friends *for free* via Xbox Live. No matter what we do. On my PS3 I can only send text messages, when I am in a game, and my friends are doing something different.I can replace the music in any game on the Xbox 360 with my own favorite MP3s, while the console keeps the game’s sound effects so I still know what’s going on. Especially cool: If I throw a party, I connect my iPod and PC to my console and load up Guitar Hero. While the game idles in the main menu, the party guests are listening to an endless stream of MP3s. When someone picks up the guitar and chooses a song, the Xbox 360 pauses my music, lets the player shred to his selected tune, and as soon as he returns to the main menu, the console resumes my MP3 music again. I can insert a game and play right away. A lot of games on the PS3 force you to a lengthy install to improve loading times. If I want faster loading times, I can now *optionally* install a game on the Xbox harddisc. If I want to play right now, I insert the disc and off I go.Better graphics: I often read in Answers that the graphics on the PS3 are better because of the Blu-Ray disc. From a technical point of view this is so terribly wrong. Blu-Ray is “just” a storage medium. The graphics are generated by the graphics hardware in real time. While the PS3 has an impressive Cell Processor that can do wonders with Physics simulations, Sony had the nerve to implement a slow memory interface. Games mean graphics, and graphics need to be rendered Professional Mixing Consoles in the framebuffer. At 550MHz the RSX processor alone needs almost 60GB for Z-Testing and coloring a 3D image on a 48GB/sec memory bandwidth (don’t mix this bandwidth with bandwidth inside the Cell chip. This is of no use in this context).The Xbox 360 has 256GB/sec reserved just for the framebuffer alone, allowing it to do High Dynamic Range rendering, Anti Aliasing, and all that fancy stuff and still has over 20GB/sec free on the main Bus for textures and vertex data.This is the reason, why only very few games on both consoles really are 1080p games, and why even fewer games on the PS3 have a higher resolution than the Xbox 360 counterpart. No matter how long the programmers learn to manage the PS3 hardware.Also, I can simply get a HD VGA cable and connect the console to a high resolution VGA monitor, and get HD quality graphics without a HDTV. Even up to resolutions of full 1080p. You can Install Linux on the PS3:Well, yeah, but for what purpose? You will have a 256MB PC, that can’t do any 3D graphics, as the PS3’s hypervisor doesn’t allow the Linux system to access the graphics hardware. For 400 Dollar. For less than 300 Bucks I can get an office PC with 2GB Ram, fully working Vista and 3D acceleration. This can play games and applications better than the PS3 when running Linux.The Xbox offers you free professional game development tools (the XNA creator Studio) which you can use to write your own games. Also complete with full 3D acceleration. High Failure Rate:My Xbox 360 didn’t break down, and so hasn’t my PS3 yet. However, if I read reports, that a PS3 console gets denied a warranty repair because it’s too dusty, then I could foam with anger.If I have a problem or the Xbox 360 breaks down I call the toll free support hotline. If the console has to be repaired (as it happened to a friend), a UPS messenger comes, picks up the console for free and two weeks later the console is back again. No strings attached.———–Things the PS3 can do better:Blu-Ray Movies. I admit, it’s really comfortable to just pop in a movie disc and watch it right away. But if necessary, I could also rip a Blu-Ray Movie to my PC’s harddisc and watch the movie in High Definition on my Xbox 360 streamed over the network.Free Online play:Yes, the online play is free. But you get what you pay for. While I more than often gnaw at the Dual-Shock because the Multiplayer just doesn’t work, I get for less than $3,50 a month a great multiplayer Matchmaking and more than often free goodies (I received 2 free Arcade games as a thank you for being a 1 year Gold Member, and I can go to Germany’s Games Convention for free for one day, access to the Backstage Area, where I got a free drink and a voucher for a free HD movie download).And since the PS3 still costs almost 400, I can get the Xbox 360, and with the leftover money get more games, and online play. ———————-Things which are tied (in my opinion):While the PS3 can surf websiteThis got cut off:Things which are tied (in my opinion):While the PS3 can surf websites, I can also use a Media Center plug in and surf websites with full Internet Explorer Compatibility.TV: The PS3 has Play-TV which allows us (in PAL countries) to watch a few selected TV stations in crappy DVB-T quality.On the Xbox 360 together with Media Center I can also watch Live TV, Timeshift and watch recorded TV shows.Home: I tried it on the PS3 and was rather unimpressed. It’s just Second Life Sony Style. And not released yet.On the Xbox 360 I now see my friends as avatar representations, and their friends standing in a group next to them. It’s like a 3D Facebook. And I don’t even have to wander around giant apartments or areas to meet them.So in conclusion:Pick my reasons apart why the Xbox 360 ist (in my opinion) better, and find factual evidence, and tell me: Where am I wrong?10 Points to the most well formed answer, that also shows it’s sources with factual evidence.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Okay, you probably read some answers from me, where heated discussions broke loose because I recommended the Xbox 360 to an asker. Don’t get me wrong! This is not a trolling attempt or an incentive to break out a flame war. I want factual reasons. Provide links and evidence to your answers!I say: My Xbox 360 can do everything my PS3 does. Only better and cheaper. What I can do on the Xbox 360 that the PS3 can’t:I can *talk* to up to 7 additional friends *for free* via Xbox Live. No matter what we do. On my PS3 I can only send text messages, when I am in a game, and my friends are doing something different.I can replace the music in any game on the Xbox 360 with my own favorite MP3s, while the console keeps the game’s sound effects so I still know what’s going on. Especially cool: If I throw a party, I connect my iPod and PC to my console and load up Guitar Hero. While the game idles in the main menu, the party guests are listening to an endless stream of MP3s. When someone picks up the guitar and chooses a song, the Xbox 360 pauses my music, lets the player shred to his selected tune, and as soon as he returns to the main menu, the console resumes my MP3 music again. I can insert a game and play right away. A lot of games on the PS3 force you to a lengthy install to improve loading times. If I want faster loading times, I can now *optionally* install a game on the Xbox harddisc. If I want to play right now, I insert the disc and off I go.Better graphics: I often read in Answers that the graphics on the PS3 are better because of the Blu-Ray disc. From a technical point of view this is so terribly wrong. Blu-Ray is “just” a storage medium. The graphics are generated by the graphics hardware in real time. While the PS3 has an impressive Cell Processor that can do wonders with Physics simulations, Sony had the nerve to implement a slow memory interface. Games mean graphics, and graphics need to be rendered Professional Mixing Consoles in the framebuffer. At 550MHz the RSX processor alone needs almost 60GB for Z-Testing and coloring a 3D image on a 48GB/sec memory bandwidth (don’t mix this bandwidth with bandwidth inside the Cell chip. This is of no use in this context).The Xbox 360 has 256GB/sec reserved just for the framebuffer alone, allowing it to do High Dynamic Range rendering, Anti Aliasing, and all that fancy stuff and still has over 20GB/sec free on the main Bus for textures and vertex data.This is the reason, why only very few games on both consoles really are 1080p games, and why even fewer games on the PS3 have a higher resolution than the Xbox 360 counterpart. No matter how long the programmers learn to manage the PS3 hardware.Also, I can simply get a HD VGA cable and connect the console to a high resolution VGA monitor, and get HD quality graphics without a HDTV. Even up to resolutions of full 1080p. You can Install Linux on the PS3:Well, yeah, but for what purpose? You will have a 256MB PC, that can’t do any 3D graphics, as the PS3’s hypervisor doesn’t allow the Linux system to access the graphics hardware. For 400 Dollar. For less than 300 Bucks I can get an office PC with 2GB Ram, fully working Vista and 3D acceleration. This can play games and applications better than the PS3 when running Linux.The Xbox offers you free professional game development tools (the XNA creator Studio) which you can use to write your own games. Also complete with full 3D acceleration. High Failure Rate:My Xbox 360 didn’t break down, and so hasn’t my PS3 yet. However, if I read reports, that a PS3 console gets denied a warranty repair because it’s too dusty, then I could foam with anger.If I have a problem or the Xbox 360 breaks down I call the toll free support hotline. If the console has to be repaired (as it happened to a friend), a UPS messenger comes, picks up the console for free and two weeks later the console is back again. No strings attached.———–Things the PS3 can do better:Blu-Ray Movies. I admit, it’s really comfortable to just pop in a movie disc and watch it right away. But if necessary, I could also rip a Blu-Ray Movie to my PC’s harddisc and watch the movie in High Definition on my Xbox 360 streamed over the network.Free Online play:Yes, the online play is free. But you get what you pay for. While I more than often gnaw at the Dual-Shock because the Multiplayer just doesn’t work, I get for less than $3,50 a month a great multiplayer Matchmaking and more than often free goodies (I received 2 free Arcade games as a thank you for being a 1 year Gold Member, and I can go to Germany’s Games Convention for free for one day, access to the Backstage Area, where I got a free drink and a voucher for a free HD movie download).And since the PS3 still costs almost 400, I can get the Xbox 360, and with the leftover money get more games, and online play. ———————-Things which are tied (in my opinion):While the PS3 can surf websiteThis got cut off:Things which are tied (in my opinion):While the PS3 can surf websites, I can also use a Media Center plug in and surf websites with full Internet Explorer Compatibility.TV: The PS3 has Play-TV which allows us (in PAL countries) to watch a few selected TV stations in crappy DVB-T quality.On the Xbox 360 together with Media Center I can also watch Live TV, Timeshift and watch recorded TV shows.Home: I tried it on the PS3 and was rather unimpressed. It’s just Second Life Sony Style. And not released yet.On the Xbox 360 I now see my friends as avatar representations, and their friends standing in a group next to them. It’s like a 3D Facebook. And I don’t even have to wander around giant apartments or areas to meet them.So in conclusion:Pick my reasons apart why the Xbox 360 ist (in my opinion) better, and find factual evidence, and tell me: Where am I wrong?10 Points to the most well formed answer, that also shows it’s sources with factual evidence.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Watch the video related to Professional Mixing Consoles
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Professional Mixing Consoles
Tags: Guidance, Keyword, Mixing Consoles