01
Aug
Evaluation on Professional Recording studio Equipment List
Author: DJEquip // Category: Eventide Timefactor
I got just one thing to say, No two! “I cant wait to get another pair and the sub……. From the moment I hooked them up I knew that these were the ones. I’m listening to some Smokey Norful through them right now and I am in Heaven!
Thank You!
How much would setting up a high quality recording studio cost?
OK I realize this question is very vague, depending on how much equipment you need to buy, but here’s a list of equipment that I would think to purchase, and just give me some advice if I’m Professional Recording studio Equipment List missing anything important.[DAW] Cubase 5 – $300[Mixer] Yamaha MG206C – $650[Mic] Sterling ST66 (for vocals) – $400[Mic] 2x SM57 – $200[Mic] 2x SM58 – $200Drum Kit – ~$2000All other miscellaneous equipment (stands, cables, etc) – $1000So with all this equipment ($4900) what kind of sound quality would I get? Certainly not professional grade, but what could I expect?Any advice for more/less equipment is more than welcome. Also if the equipment I stated is garbage, feel free to advise an alternative.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
OK I realize this question is very vague, depending on how much equipment you need to buy, but here’s a list of equipment that I would think to purchase, and just give me some advice if I’m Professional Recording studio Equipment List missing anything important.[DAW] Cubase 5 – $300[Mixer] Yamaha MG206C – $650[Mic] Sterling ST66 (for vocals) – $400[Mic] 2x SM57 – $200[Mic] 2x SM58 – $200Drum Kit – ~$2000All other miscellaneous equipment (stands, cables, etc) – $1000So with all this equipment ($4900) what kind of sound quality would I get? Certainly not professional grade, but what could I expect?Any advice for more/less equipment is more than welcome. Also if the equipment I stated is garbage, feel free to advise an alternative.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Watch the video related to Professional Recording studio Equipment List
Professional Recording studio Equipment List

Tags: Heaven, Keyword List, Professional Recording Studio, Professional Recording Studio Equipment, Recording Studio Equipment, Smokey Norful





August 2nd, 2010 at 12:06 am
I’m looking forward to my future recordings using the 802 – It is always fun to have a new toy! Highly recommended piece of equipment that is nice value for the cost.I was looking for a low cost mixer to use with my other recorder and did a little research on the leading brands. Just looking at it with it’s inputs, number of controls, I would have guessed it cost close to a couple hundred bucks. Imagine my surprise when, after reading the positive reviews, that I discovered this thing was only ! I bought it immediately and, right out of the box, it did exactly everything I was expecting it to – this is a truly nice little piece of equipment for getting the recording control and flexibility that is not inherent on some of the other models.
August 2nd, 2010 at 12:36 pm
I like it, I’d take it everywhere I go. The cool thing about this mixer is it has phantom power built in, small enough to store or place any where. I like it a lot.
August 3rd, 2010 at 12:09 am
I baught purchased this mixer years ago from Guitar Center to record my band. It did a really good job. For the price and quality, it’s just good!
August 3rd, 2010 at 12:28 pm
I have had the Behringer XENYX 802 for about 6 months now, and it has done everything that I’ve wanted. I mainly use it to record guitar, but I’ve used it for various other things as well. I hook it up to my laptop via a Behringer UCA 202, and it works perfectly.
The only problem I had with it was when I first got it, it kept freezing and blasting a loud buzzing sound. The reason why it did this was because the power wasn’t plugged into the back of it all the way, once I figured that out it never did it again.
Very good product, I would recommend it to anyone wanting to start a “mini-recording studio”.
August 4th, 2010 at 12:33 am
I would have valued this mic far above what it is being sold. Right off the bat, the construction is pro grade, all the way. Solid metal, heavy weight and a nice mat bluish silver finish. The sound quality is excellent. It records warm and rich vocals: running through a Digidesign Mbox 2 mini. It picks up every nuance and every breath. It’s almost too clear. Haven’t used it to record any instruments, only voice in studio. My voice sounds better on this than other mics I’ve used. Very very impressed. And it was well under $100!
August 4th, 2010 at 12:27 pm
I use this microphone to record acoustic guitar and vocals in Garageband. It’s plugged into an ART Tube MP phantom power/preamp which feeds into an M-Audio Fasttrack USB. It’s an affordable setup and sounds great to me.
If you are looking to record yourself in any capacity, I think this mic would do well for you. The mic picks up every overtone and nuance of the acoustic guitar and sounds MUCH better than plugging the guitar’s pickup directly into the M-Audio box.
Vocal recording with this mic is shockingly accurate (to me anyway). My previous mic was an off-brand dynamic which sounded dull in comparison to the AKG. For better or worse, this mic will record you EXACTLY the way you are.
The mic is well built and feels robust. Build quality is absolutely no concern with this mic, and that is primarily what steered me away from the MXL 990.
Some considerations on buying this (or any condenser) mic:
You must have a solid stand. It’s a pretty heavy mic and you don’t want to test the build quality by watching it crash to the floor.
You will need a phantom power & preamp source. Phantom power alone will not do the job.
These mics pick up EVERYTHING. If you breathe funny while playing guitar you’ll hear it on the recording. If you hit pickguard while strumming, this mic picks that up quite loudly. If you leave your cellphone on vibrate on the other side of the room, it’ll pick that up too. SO, if you can’t record in a relatively quiet room you’ll be amazed/frustrated with all that you hear in the recording.
You will want to buy a pop screen if you plan record vocals at all. These mics sound best if you speak/sing directly into them (as I understand) and doing so will produce a loud “puh” sound frequently. The answer is a $20 pop screen.
Downsides to this mic are primarily in the value department. The MXL 990 includes a shock mount and carrying case at the same price. The Perception 220 has a larger diaphragm, comes with the shock mount and carrying case, looks a bit cooler and costs about $80 more. A decent shock mount will cost $40 and I have yet to find the AKG-branded case for sale by its self online, so the price difference is well made up just by the included accessories. Realistically, I don’t see much of a need for the shock mount in my setup, and in the unlikely event that I carry the thing elsewhere I can just use the box/foam it came in.
Overall I’m quite pleased with this microphone. I’d give it 4.5 stars for the lack of a spider mount and case, but to me those are non-issues. This is a great mic from a great brand and I’m confident that if you buy it (and have no need for the shock mount/case) you’ll be just as happy as I am with your purchase.
August 5th, 2010 at 12:06 am
I was using a USB headset microphone for my LibriVox volunteer work. A few weeks ago, I upgraded to this AKG Perception 120 condenser microphone.
It is awesome. It sounds warm and full and has an overall beautiful sound. I’m very happy with this microphone. I should have upgraded a long time ago.
One warning: be sure to purchase a stand in the same order. I ordered my stand separately, so I had to hold the microphone while I used it for the first few days. It’s a heavy piece of equipment, and my arms got tired very quickly.
August 5th, 2010 at 12:03 pm
Kind of overkill as computer speakers, but they sound great whether I’m watching a movie at my desk or listening to music in the adjoining rooms.
August 6th, 2010 at 12:39 am
When my 2.1 Altec Lansing speaker system that was bundled with a 1998 Dell desktop computer (and had been transferred to later desktops through the ensuing years) stopped working due to a wiring problem that I could not repair myself, I decided to buy a new speaker system. After a diligent online search and reading user reviews, I selected the M-Audio Studiophile AV30 and I could not be happier. Although it lacks a sub-woofer, which my earlier system had, the bass is hefty enough for my taste when the bass boost switch is set to the on position. The speakers provide a clean, crisp sound, with excellent separation of the musical lines from each instrument. I’m hearing elements in my music files that I had not noticed with my earlier speakers. The volume level can be cranked up to much more than I need, without distortion, but I mostly have it set near the low end. And with only two speakers, I don’t have to maneuver to find space for a sub-woofer.
These speakers sound so good I hate to turn off my computer, which I frequently use solely to listen to Internet radio stations.
August 6th, 2010 at 11:52 am
The M-Audio AV30 speakers produce an amazingly true sound. Not too tinny, and not too much boom. They sound solid and no hint of the cheap ‘rattling’ sound with some many other computer speakers.
I’ve not yet turned on the bass-boost feature – I mostly listen to acoustic, folk, and vocals. However, this would probably work well for the techno/dance sounds.
The speakers are attractive looking and well finished. Hookup is easy and the documentation is well written.
There’s a front “Aux-In” jack for your iPod, and a “Phones” jack out for headphones just for completeness.
Great speakers! Good Job M-Audio.
August 7th, 2010 at 12:36 am
The bass notes between 128 and 248Hz, specially the lower C note on the bass guitar, are very loud. No, it’s not my room, and it’s not the sound card either. I’ve tried other speakers on the same computer and in the same room and they all sound normal. I then tried these speakers on my friend’s system, in his room, and had the same problem. I contacted M-Audio’s technical support through their website, and they said that the sound is a matter of taste and is not covered under the warranty. A matter of personal taste, huh? Every time I have people over to listen to some music, they go “WTF!?”. “A matter of taste” MY A**!
Also, the headphones output port is totally useless. The volume on the headphones is very low; you have to increase the volume, but then you get a constant static noise on the headphones. Oh, and make sure you lower the volume before unplugging the headphones or you risk damaging your eardrums.
It may have worked well for others, but my speakers are definitely defective and the company is not taking responsibility for it. I ended up paying another $50 to buy Hear ([...]) in order to fine-tune the sound output, but it turns out that the program is not really stable on OS X 10.5 and 10.6 either (it stops working for some reason and you’ll have to reboot your machine to make it work again). I’m really pissed off!
I’m leaving these out on the curb tonight and buying a pair of monitor speakers from a local music store AFTER listening to them.
August 7th, 2010 at 12:17 pm
This book gives the reader the insight, knowledge, and expertise necessary for the comprehension of the basic concepts of the audio industry. It is a well written and concise book on the subject of audio and sound.
August 8th, 2010 at 12:07 am
This was the required text book for a course I took at Berklee and is probably the single best book I have read on this topic. If you are new to audio theory/practice or have been messing with it for a while but want to improve your fundamental understanding, this is definitely the book you want.
Topics include a brief history of audio reproduction, the fundamental physics of sound, the mechanics of capturing and reprocing sound, digital audio theory, and psychoacoustics (how your ears and brain process sound). Also, many practical topics such as how to evaluate and acoustically treat rooms are covered. All of these topics are covered in sufficient detail, but presented in a very clear and understandable way.
August 8th, 2010 at 12:02 pm
I just started to work with the technical group at Church and needed to come up to speed on audio systems. I’m an amateur radio operator (ham) so technical things didn’t scare me but I just didn’t know about the equipment or concepts.
This was a great book to show me what’s out there, how it’s controlled and what to look for.
I’ve realized the world is ratio’s and this book did a great job showing how things are processed and reasons why they are that way. Great book to learn from and a fantastic book to double check others thoughts. (Yea, politics)
Best book I’ve seen so far on audio systems to date.
August 8th, 2010 at 11:49 pm
A textbook for students of no direction.The author dips into everything possible in the subject of audio production ,in a schematic, superficial, lightweight, naive and easy way that the reader is left without real information, motivation ,inspiration or
means of accomplishing anything – being sound design and manipulation or music creation and production.In fact it’s a feel-good book written for those ignorant or already knowing a bit, provided they are not interested in learning anything more.
The title appears deceptive (actually it is much more enticing than the author’s credentials).
Do you remember those “look busy” screensavers of the old days?They made you look to others as if you were doing something very serious and difficult while doing really nothing; well, leave this book open in your DAW desk : it’s the printed equivalent.